delhi high court
The ED’s arrest of Kejriwal came shortly after the high court declined to grant him protection from coercive measures by the central anti-money laundering agency
[…]A bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet PS Arora emphasised that failure to produce the draft policy before the next hearing would prompt the court to proceed with the matter
[…]The court emphasised that the Kalkaji Mandir is for the use of the public, and no individual or entity can exercise exclusive control over any part of it. Therefore, any event must have the administrator’s approval
[…]The ‘Akhoondji mosque,’ believed to be more than 600 years old, and the Behrul Uloom madrasa in the vicinity were declared illegal structures in Sanjay Van and were demolished by the DDA on January 30
[…]The court acted on a petition filed by a resident of Gurugram, alleging that Zomato was engaging in “false and fraudulent” practices by delivering fresh food from renowned restaurants under its sub-category, ‘Dilli ke Legends’
[…]The court ruled that during the man’s lifetime, there was no valid reason for his ex-wife to replace his name with her second husband’s on their son’s school admission form
[…]The bench emphasised that orders related to phone interception, tapping, or tracking are issued by the government when authorized officers deem it necessary for the country’s well-being
[…]In October, the Supreme Court, recognizing the prolonged bondage and inhumane conditions endured by manual scavengers, called for the complete eradication of manual scavenging nationwide
[…]