Delhi NCR

Delhi HC rejects plea against mandatory uniform for auto drivers

Published by
Patriot Bureau

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition challenging the requirement of mandatory uniforms for auto rickshaw and taxi drivers in the city.

The bench, comprising Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad, rejected the petition and criticised it as a gross misuse of a public interest litigation (PIL).

The petition was filed by Chaalak Shakti, a drivers’ union, which argued against the compulsory uniform policy for auto rickshaw and taxi drivers, claiming that it violated the Constitution. The petitioner’s counsel contended that prescribing a uniform infringed upon the drivers’ freedom of expression and served as a symbol of their social status.

The counsel representing the Delhi government defended the need for discipline and uniformity in relation to driver uniforms. The high court had previously asked the government’s counsel to clarify whether khaki or grey-colored uniforms were mandated for auto drivers in the national capital.

The petitioner alleged that hefty fines of up to Rs 20,000 were being imposed on drivers for not wearing uniforms, despite the lack of clarity and ambiguity in the relevant laws.

The petitioner argued that Rule 7 of the Delhi Motor Vehicles Rules, 1993 prescribed khaki uniforms, while the permit conditions set by the state authorities mandated grey uniforms.

Furthermore, the petitioner highlighted the absence of a clear definition of the uniform itself, including the type of clothing and specifications of fabrics, trims, and accessories.

The plea also emphasised that many major cities worldwide, such as London, New York, Hong Kong, Sydney, and Dubai, did not impose any uniform requirements on taxi drivers. The petitioner asserted that the vagueness and ambiguity surrounding the uniform policy caused significant distress and harm.

Ultimately, the Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory uniform policy, rejecting the petition and reiterating its view that the case was an inappropriate use of a PIL. (With inputs from PTI)

Patriot Bureau

Published by
Patriot Bureau

Recent Posts

In clash between competing leagues, Indian golfers stand to benefit

Rival leagues trigger players’ suspensions and a legal battle in Indian golf, for now

December 18, 2025

Kejriwal slams Centre, Delhi govt over Delhi pollution

Former Delhi CM Kejriwal criticises Centre, Delhi govt over worsening air pollution, alleges AQI manipulation

December 18, 2025

Delhi Police busts fake engine oil unit in Nangloi, seizes counterfeit goods worth Rs 1 cr

Delhi Police raids Nangloi unit producing fake engine oil, seizes over Rs 1 crore worth…

December 18, 2025

‘Decoding Digital DNA’: a solo exhibition by Mukesh Sharma

Mukesh Sharma reimagines digital components as living matter in his solo exhibition ‘Decoding Digital DNA’

December 18, 2025

Delhi Police busts interstate gangs supplying mule bank accounts to cybercrooks; 9 arrested

Nine accused were arrested in coordinated raids as police uncovered organised networks supplying mule bank…

December 18, 2025

Over 1.56 lakh challans issued in Delhi in two months for PUC violations

Nearly 1.57 lakh PUC challans issued in two months as Delhi steps up GRAP enforcement…

December 18, 2025