Delhi NCR

Delhi HC rejects plea against mandatory uniform for auto drivers

Published by
Patriot Bureau

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition challenging the requirement of mandatory uniforms for auto rickshaw and taxi drivers in the city.

The bench, comprising Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad, rejected the petition and criticised it as a gross misuse of a public interest litigation (PIL).

The petition was filed by Chaalak Shakti, a drivers’ union, which argued against the compulsory uniform policy for auto rickshaw and taxi drivers, claiming that it violated the Constitution. The petitioner’s counsel contended that prescribing a uniform infringed upon the drivers’ freedom of expression and served as a symbol of their social status.

The counsel representing the Delhi government defended the need for discipline and uniformity in relation to driver uniforms. The high court had previously asked the government’s counsel to clarify whether khaki or grey-colored uniforms were mandated for auto drivers in the national capital.

The petitioner alleged that hefty fines of up to Rs 20,000 were being imposed on drivers for not wearing uniforms, despite the lack of clarity and ambiguity in the relevant laws.

The petitioner argued that Rule 7 of the Delhi Motor Vehicles Rules, 1993 prescribed khaki uniforms, while the permit conditions set by the state authorities mandated grey uniforms.

Furthermore, the petitioner highlighted the absence of a clear definition of the uniform itself, including the type of clothing and specifications of fabrics, trims, and accessories.

The plea also emphasised that many major cities worldwide, such as London, New York, Hong Kong, Sydney, and Dubai, did not impose any uniform requirements on taxi drivers. The petitioner asserted that the vagueness and ambiguity surrounding the uniform policy caused significant distress and harm.

Ultimately, the Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory uniform policy, rejecting the petition and reiterating its view that the case was an inappropriate use of a PIL. (With inputs from PTI)

Patriot Bureau

Published by
Patriot Bureau

Recent Posts

Delhi tribunal awards Rs 32.74 lakh to family of biker killed by speeding truck

Delhi tribunal orders insurer to pay Rs 32.74 lakh with 9% interest to family of…

August 15, 2026

Delhi: Anand Vihar, Kashmere Gate, Sarai Kale Khan to become multi-modal transport hubs

Three key transit corridors—Anand Vihar-Karkardooma, Kashmere Gate and Sarai Kale Khan-Nizamuddin—are proposed for integrated metro,…

August 15, 2026

5 historic eateries in Delhi that predate Independence

From jalebis and Mughlai delicacies to coffee and confectionery, these historic Delhi eateries have preserved…

August 15, 2026

LG Sandhu urges Delhiites to lead capital’s journey towards ‘Viksit Bharat’

Delhi LG Taranjit Singh Sandhu urged residents to build a cleaner, safer and more civic-minded…

August 15, 2026

Delhi govt plans to redesign Okhla barrage to reduce recurrent frothing: Officials

Delhi government plans to redesign Okhla Barrage, relocate polluting dhobi ghats and clear waste to…

August 15, 2026

Two held for injuring, robbing jewellery shop employee in Delhi

Two men were arrested for allegedly attacking a jewellery shop employee and robbing him of…

August 15, 2026