Delhi NCR

Delhi HC rejects plea against mandatory uniform for auto drivers

Published by
Patriot Bureau

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition challenging the requirement of mandatory uniforms for auto rickshaw and taxi drivers in the city.

The bench, comprising Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad, rejected the petition and criticised it as a gross misuse of a public interest litigation (PIL).

The petition was filed by Chaalak Shakti, a drivers’ union, which argued against the compulsory uniform policy for auto rickshaw and taxi drivers, claiming that it violated the Constitution. The petitioner’s counsel contended that prescribing a uniform infringed upon the drivers’ freedom of expression and served as a symbol of their social status.

The counsel representing the Delhi government defended the need for discipline and uniformity in relation to driver uniforms. The high court had previously asked the government’s counsel to clarify whether khaki or grey-colored uniforms were mandated for auto drivers in the national capital.

The petitioner alleged that hefty fines of up to Rs 20,000 were being imposed on drivers for not wearing uniforms, despite the lack of clarity and ambiguity in the relevant laws.

The petitioner argued that Rule 7 of the Delhi Motor Vehicles Rules, 1993 prescribed khaki uniforms, while the permit conditions set by the state authorities mandated grey uniforms.

Furthermore, the petitioner highlighted the absence of a clear definition of the uniform itself, including the type of clothing and specifications of fabrics, trims, and accessories.

The plea also emphasised that many major cities worldwide, such as London, New York, Hong Kong, Sydney, and Dubai, did not impose any uniform requirements on taxi drivers. The petitioner asserted that the vagueness and ambiguity surrounding the uniform policy caused significant distress and harm.

Ultimately, the Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory uniform policy, rejecting the petition and reiterating its view that the case was an inappropriate use of a PIL. (With inputs from PTI)

Patriot Bureau

Published by
Patriot Bureau

Recent Posts

Delhi Police rescue man attempting to jump from ISBT Kashmere Gate building

Delhi Police personnel averted a tragedy by rescuing a man who was attempting to jump…

June 21, 2026

PWD undertakes city-wide pothole repair drive ahead of monsoon

Special teams deployed across Delhi to address remaining potholes and prepare roads for the monsoon…

June 21, 2026

NEET-UG retest held at over 5,400 centres in India, abroad amid tight security

Over 22 lakh aspirants appeared for the medical entrance retest, conducted under enhanced surveillance after…

June 21, 2026

Delhi: 21-year-old man arrested for online rental scam

Gurugram man held for allegedly facilitating an online rental scam that duped a Delhi flat…

June 21, 2026

6,000 people take part in NDMC’s Yoga Day events across Delhi

Around 6,000 people joined NDMC's Yoga Day events across Delhi, promoting yoga for health and…

June 21, 2026

Delhi court acquits five in house-trespass, assault case

Court cites contradictory witness accounts, lack of evidence in granting acquittal to all five accused

June 21, 2026