Delhi NCR

Delhi HC rejects plea against mandatory uniform for auto drivers

Published by
Patriot Bureau

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition challenging the requirement of mandatory uniforms for auto rickshaw and taxi drivers in the city.

The bench, comprising Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad, rejected the petition and criticised it as a gross misuse of a public interest litigation (PIL).

The petition was filed by Chaalak Shakti, a drivers’ union, which argued against the compulsory uniform policy for auto rickshaw and taxi drivers, claiming that it violated the Constitution. The petitioner’s counsel contended that prescribing a uniform infringed upon the drivers’ freedom of expression and served as a symbol of their social status.

The counsel representing the Delhi government defended the need for discipline and uniformity in relation to driver uniforms. The high court had previously asked the government’s counsel to clarify whether khaki or grey-colored uniforms were mandated for auto drivers in the national capital.

The petitioner alleged that hefty fines of up to Rs 20,000 were being imposed on drivers for not wearing uniforms, despite the lack of clarity and ambiguity in the relevant laws.

The petitioner argued that Rule 7 of the Delhi Motor Vehicles Rules, 1993 prescribed khaki uniforms, while the permit conditions set by the state authorities mandated grey uniforms.

Furthermore, the petitioner highlighted the absence of a clear definition of the uniform itself, including the type of clothing and specifications of fabrics, trims, and accessories.

The plea also emphasised that many major cities worldwide, such as London, New York, Hong Kong, Sydney, and Dubai, did not impose any uniform requirements on taxi drivers. The petitioner asserted that the vagueness and ambiguity surrounding the uniform policy caused significant distress and harm.

Ultimately, the Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory uniform policy, rejecting the petition and reiterating its view that the case was an inappropriate use of a PIL. (With inputs from PTI)

Patriot Bureau

Published by
Patriot Bureau

Recent Posts

Beyond the blackboard: stories of unconventional mentors

Mothers, younger siblings and pets teach us so much about life through compassion, confidence and…

September 5, 2026

Delhi CM inspects waterlogged areas, directs swift drainage amid heavy rain

Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta inspected waterlogged areas in East Delhi following heavy rains and…

September 5, 2026

13-year-old girl dies by suicide after being scolded for returning home late in Delhi

A 13-year-old girl allegedly died by suicide at her residence in Delhi’s Shahdara after being…

September 5, 2026

Delhi govt felicitates 116 teachers, principals with state awards on Teachers’ Day

Delhi CM Rekha Gupta says government is addressing gaps in school infrastructure and curriculum to…

September 5, 2026

Security stepped up outside Parliament Street police station, Patiala House Court

Security was tightened outside Parliament Street police station and Patiala House Court amid supporters gathering…

September 5, 2026

Delhi court acquits father-son duo in sexual assault case, cites ‘fatal’ flaws in case

Delhi court cites contradictions, hostile eyewitness and investigation lapses while acquitting father-son duo in 2018…

September 5, 2026