Delhi NCR

Delhi HC rejects plea against mandatory uniform for auto drivers

Published by
Patriot Bureau

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition challenging the requirement of mandatory uniforms for auto rickshaw and taxi drivers in the city.

The bench, comprising Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad, rejected the petition and criticised it as a gross misuse of a public interest litigation (PIL).

The petition was filed by Chaalak Shakti, a drivers’ union, which argued against the compulsory uniform policy for auto rickshaw and taxi drivers, claiming that it violated the Constitution. The petitioner’s counsel contended that prescribing a uniform infringed upon the drivers’ freedom of expression and served as a symbol of their social status.

The counsel representing the Delhi government defended the need for discipline and uniformity in relation to driver uniforms. The high court had previously asked the government’s counsel to clarify whether khaki or grey-colored uniforms were mandated for auto drivers in the national capital.

The petitioner alleged that hefty fines of up to Rs 20,000 were being imposed on drivers for not wearing uniforms, despite the lack of clarity and ambiguity in the relevant laws.

The petitioner argued that Rule 7 of the Delhi Motor Vehicles Rules, 1993 prescribed khaki uniforms, while the permit conditions set by the state authorities mandated grey uniforms.

Furthermore, the petitioner highlighted the absence of a clear definition of the uniform itself, including the type of clothing and specifications of fabrics, trims, and accessories.

The plea also emphasised that many major cities worldwide, such as London, New York, Hong Kong, Sydney, and Dubai, did not impose any uniform requirements on taxi drivers. The petitioner asserted that the vagueness and ambiguity surrounding the uniform policy caused significant distress and harm.

Ultimately, the Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory uniform policy, rejecting the petition and reiterating its view that the case was an inappropriate use of a PIL. (With inputs from PTI)

Patriot Bureau

Published by
Patriot Bureau

Recent Posts

Delhi hospital treats recurrent pacemaker infections with dual-chamber leadless device

The technology eliminates the need for a chest pocket and wires, say doctors at Max…

September 28, 2026

SC takes suo motu cognisance of gang-rape of minor in moving bus in Delhi-NCR

The Supreme Court took suo motu cognisance of the alleged gang-rape of a 16-year-old in…

September 28, 2026

New UPI charge: Delhi traders consider a return to cash

From October 15, merchants will pay a 0.4% MDR on UPI transactions above Rs 2,000,…

September 28, 2026

Delhi court issues notice in women wrestlers’ appeal against Brij Bhushan’s acquittal

Delhi court issues notice to Brij Bhushan Singh, Vinod Tomar on wrestlers’ appeal against acquittal

September 28, 2026

Delhi logs minimum temperature of 23 deg C; IMD forecasts cloudy skies

Delhi recorded a minimum temperature of 23 degrees Celsius, slightly below normal, with the IMD…

September 28, 2026

Delhi: Over 14,000 challans issued in week; wrong-side driving tops violations

Delhi Traffic Police issued 14,160 challans and notices during a week-long drive, with 10,434 cases…

September 27, 2026