Delhi NCR

Mere breakup not enough for abetment to suicide: Delhi HC

Published by
PTI

Merely breaking up may not amount to instigation for a case of abetment of suicide under the criminal law, the Delhi High Court has said.

Justice Manoj Jain made the observation while dealing with a bail plea by a man accused of abetting the suicide of his former partner, who hanged herself five days after his marriage to another woman.

Granting bail to the accused, the court observed that the instigation should be of such a nature that leaves the deceased with no option but to commit suicide.

It said only a trial would establish whether the deceased’s “extreme step” was on account of provocation, instigation, “merely on account of her being hyper-sensitive girl” or for some other reason.

In the present case, the court noted, there was no dying declaration, and the parties were in a relationship for around eight years, during which there was no complaint from the deceased.

The court observed there was a considerable time gap between the date when the parties stopped talking and the date of the suicide.

“Apparently, it seems to be a case of a broken relationship and quite possibly, the deceased, having come to know that the applicant has got married to someone else, has chosen to finish herself,” the court said in the order passed on February 24.

“Though broken relationship and heartbreaks have become common these days, mere breaking-up of relationship may not per se constitute instigation so as to make it to be a case of abetment under Section 108 BNS (abetment of suicide),” the court order read.

According to the father of the deceased, his daughter had been trapped by the accused, who pressured her to convert to his religion for marriage, and it was under such pressure that his daughter committed suicide by hanging herself with a chunni in October 2025.

The accused was arrested in November 2025.

The court observed that, according to the woman’s friends, she was upset, and they never claimed anything on conversion. The accused had stopped talking to her from February 2025 onwards, it said.

According to the order, the man was let out on bail on a personal bond and surety bond of Rs 25,000 each.

The accused submitted that the parties were in a cordial relationship for around eight years, but the woman’s parents were against the relationship since they belonged to different religions.

He alleged that it was her parents who forced her to sever the relationship.

PTI

Published by
PTI
Tags: delhi

Recent Posts

‘Khoya-Paya’: how Delhi festivals handle missing children

At least 50 cases have already been reported this month; NCPCR guidelines mandate help desks,…

October 20, 2026

Metro footfall halved on October 10 amid protest curbs

DMRC says zero reduction in train trips, attributes decline to security measures and public apprehension…

October 19, 2026

Delhi court denies anticipatory bail to professor accused of rape, threatening student with videos

A Delhi court denied bail to a former DU professor accused of raping a student,…

October 19, 2026

Delhi Police files 500-page chargesheet in Manipuri musician’s murder case

Delhi Police charged seven dhaba workers in the fatal beating of a Manipuri musician who…

October 19, 2026

7 sewage treatment plants in Delhi fail discharge standards

Seven Delhi STPs failed DPCC standards in September, dumping high levels of faecal coliform and…

October 19, 2026

Neha Bora moves Delhi HC against police notice

AISA chief Neha Bora petitioned the Delhi HC against a police notice requiring a peace…

October 19, 2026