Delhi NCR

Mere breakup not enough for abetment to suicide: Delhi HC

Published by
PTI

Merely breaking up may not amount to instigation for a case of abetment of suicide under the criminal law, the Delhi High Court has said.

Justice Manoj Jain made the observation while dealing with a bail plea by a man accused of abetting the suicide of his former partner, who hanged herself five days after his marriage to another woman.

Granting bail to the accused, the court observed that the instigation should be of such a nature that leaves the deceased with no option but to commit suicide.

It said only a trial would establish whether the deceased’s “extreme step” was on account of provocation, instigation, “merely on account of her being hyper-sensitive girl” or for some other reason.

In the present case, the court noted, there was no dying declaration, and the parties were in a relationship for around eight years, during which there was no complaint from the deceased.

The court observed there was a considerable time gap between the date when the parties stopped talking and the date of the suicide.

“Apparently, it seems to be a case of a broken relationship and quite possibly, the deceased, having come to know that the applicant has got married to someone else, has chosen to finish herself,” the court said in the order passed on February 24.

“Though broken relationship and heartbreaks have become common these days, mere breaking-up of relationship may not per se constitute instigation so as to make it to be a case of abetment under Section 108 BNS (abetment of suicide),” the court order read.

According to the father of the deceased, his daughter had been trapped by the accused, who pressured her to convert to his religion for marriage, and it was under such pressure that his daughter committed suicide by hanging herself with a chunni in October 2025.

The accused was arrested in November 2025.

The court observed that, according to the woman’s friends, she was upset, and they never claimed anything on conversion. The accused had stopped talking to her from February 2025 onwards, it said.

According to the order, the man was let out on bail on a personal bond and surety bond of Rs 25,000 each.

The accused submitted that the parties were in a cordial relationship for around eight years, but the woman’s parents were against the relationship since they belonged to different religions.

He alleged that it was her parents who forced her to sever the relationship.

PTI

Published by
PTI
Tags: delhi

Recent Posts

The vintage vault: 5 nostalgia, thrift and analog gems in Hauz Khas Village

From rare vinyl and vintage Bollywood posters to Y2K fashion and reworked denim, discover five…

September 30, 2026

Between classrooms and counselling rooms

Psychology students providing mental health support navigate academic pressure, emotional demands, grief and the challenge…

September 30, 2026

Fake Apple tech-support call centre targeting US citizens busted in Delhi, 7 arrested

Delhi Police busted a fake Apple call centre in Naraina targeting US citizens via gift-card…

September 30, 2026

Cabinet approves Intelligent Traffic Management System (ITMS) for Delhi

Union Cabinet approves Rs 1,789.52-crore ITMS for Delhi, covering 42 traffic corridors with adaptive signals,…

September 30, 2026

Delhi riots 2020: HC refuses bail to Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in UAPA case

The Delhi High Court dismissed the third bail pleas of Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam…

September 30, 2026

Barapullah Phase 3 to ease East-South Delhi travel, but Sarai Kale Khan may face congestion: Experts

Barapullah Phase 3 eases East-South Delhi travel, but experts warn it may cause traffic congestion…

September 30, 2026