
The Centre’s panel on Delhi-NCR’s air quality lifted restrictions under Stage 3 of the Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP) on Monday, following a decline in pollution due to favourable meteorological conditions, as per an official order.
Delhi’s average Air Quality Index (AQI) fell below 300, creating conditions conducive to pollutant dispersion. This prompted the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) to withdraw the curbs under Stage 3 of GRAP.
Stage 3 of GRAP imposes a ban on non-essential construction activities. Schools up to grade V are required to transition to a hybrid learning mode, allowing parents and students to opt for online education wherever available.
Additionally, Stage 3 restricts the use of BS-III petrol and BS-IV diesel four-wheelers in Delhi and nearby NCR districts, with exemptions for persons with disabilities. It also prohibits non-essential diesel-operated medium goods vehicles with BS-IV or older standards from operating in Delhi.
During winter, the Delhi-NCR region enforces GRAP restrictions, which classify air quality into four categories: Stage I (Poor, AQI 201-300), Stage II (Very Poor, AQI 301-400), Stage III (Severe, AQI 401-450), and Stage IV (Severe Plus, AQI above 450).
Also Read: Delhi polls: Party manifestos fall short of addressing pollution
Adverse meteorological conditions, coupled with emissions from vehicles, paddy-straw burning, firecrackers, and other local pollution sources, contribute to hazardous air quality levels in Delhi-NCR during the winter season.
(With inputs from PTI)
Delhi Police personnel averted a tragedy by rescuing a man who was attempting to jump…
Special teams deployed across Delhi to address remaining potholes and prepare roads for the monsoon…
Over 22 lakh aspirants appeared for the medical entrance retest, conducted under enhanced surveillance after…
Gurugram man held for allegedly facilitating an online rental scam that duped a Delhi flat…
Around 6,000 people joined NDMC's Yoga Day events across Delhi, promoting yoga for health and…
Court cites contradictory witness accounts, lack of evidence in granting acquittal to all five accused