Delhi NCR

Delhi Rent Control Act anachronistic legislation: Delhi HC

Published by
PTI

Delhi HC: The Delhi High court has called the Delhi Rent Control Act an “anachronistic piece of legislation” the “egregious” misuse of which has forced property owners into desperate circumstances as well-off tenants “unjustly occupy premises for decades on-end”.

Justice Anup Jairam Bhambani was hearing petitions against the 2013 orders of the additional rent controller (ARC) that dismissed eviction petitions of the UK and Dubai-based owners of a property in Sadar Bazar and ruled in favour of tenants.

“This court is compelled to record that while manning the Rent Control Roster it has found that cases abound where very well-off tenants enjoying financial prosperity persist in unjustly occupying premises for decades on-end, paying pittance for rent, while in the process their landlords are forced into impecunious and desperate circumstances, resulting from egregious misuse of an anachronistic piece of legislation, namely the Delhi Rent Control Act,” the court said.

Also read: AIIMS moves Delhi HC against order allowing minor rape survivor to terminate pregnancy

The high court, as a result, allowed the petitioners to evict the tenants.

The petitioners sought the eviction of the premises on the ground that they run two restaurants in London and require the space for expanding the business in India.

The ARC had denied the eviction, noting that the petitioners were settled-in and were running their businesses in London and Dubai, and did not require the premises for their “subsistence or survival”, and that their bona fide requirement did not amount to being an “actual need”.

It also said the premises were too small to run a sit-in restaurant from.

Also read: ED questions ex-Delhi minister Satyendar Jain in DJB-linked PMLA case

The high court set aside the eviction order and said “the financial wellbeing of a landlord, or the financial ill-health of a tenant, were not relevant considerations while deciding an eviction petition under section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act”.

The court further said whether the petitioners were able to run a full-fledged, sit-down restaurant or a smaller food takeaway vend was entirely their prerogative.

PTI

Published by
PTI
Tags: Delhi HC

Recent Posts

New Delhi Declaration on AI Impact adopted; US, UK, China among signatories

On the principle of 'Sarvajan Hitaya, Sarvajan Sukhaya' -- Welfare for all, Happiness for all…

February 21, 2026

How to look for missing kin in Delhi: a guide

With hundreds reported missing in Delhi this year, this guide explains how families can use…

February 21, 2026

Delhi: Man dupes divorced woman of gold worth lakhs as prospective groom

The case came to light after a 35-year-old woman from Panipat alleged that she had…

February 21, 2026

Brothers held for stealing cash from shoppers’ carry bags in Delhi market

During the investigation, CCTV footage helped identify the suspects, according to Delhi Police

February 21, 2026

Delhi Police: Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena launches logo for Anti-Narcotics Task Force

The launch took place during the inauguration of the Delhi Police Exhibition Hall at Connaught…

February 21, 2026

Delhi: Factory owner stabbed to death in Narela

The 28-year-old factory owner was taken to Satyawadi Raja Harish Chandra Hospital in Delhi, while…

February 21, 2026