The Delhi High Court on Thursday sought response of the Directorate of Education on a plea by Delhi Public School, Dwarka, challenging a DoE’s order directing the institution to reinstate the 31 students who were expelled for non-payment of hiked fees.
Justice Vikas Mahajan issued notice to the Delhi government’s Directorate of Education (DoE) on the school’s petition and asked it to file its reply within six weeks.
The court listed the matter for further hearing on August 28, when another petition by over 100 parents seeking protection of their children amid the ongoing fee hike issue was also fixed.
Also Read: Aahwahan Foundation launches initiative to combat cervical cancer
During the hearing, the counsel for the school urged the court to stay the DoE’s May 15 order directing the school to withdraw the strike off orders issued on May 9 and reinstate the fee defaulter students on the school rolls.
The court also issued notice on a plea by several parents seeking to be impleaded and heard in the case.
The school claimed that the DoE’s order was ex-facie arbitrary and contrary to the law and that it failed to provide any cogent reasons for the school to reinstate the names of the fee defaulter students.
It said the order was against the provisions of the Delhi School Education Act and Rules, 1973, which empowered the head of the school to strike off the names on account of non-payment of fees.
The high court recently directed that parents, embroiled in fee dispute with DPS Dwarka, to deposit 50 per cent of the hiked fees for academic year 2025-26 following which their wards will be allowed to continue their studies in the classes.
Also read: ‘Who Will Care…?’: Delhi teen’s drunk driving wrecks family
The court clarified that the rebate of 50 per cent is on the hiked component of the fee and the base fee should be paid in full.
The interim order was passed on a petition by 102 parents seeking protection of their children amid the ongoing fee hike issue at DPS Dwarka and sought its takeover by the government and lieutenant governor in the capital.
The high court said the interim relief sought by the petitioners in this case with regard to academic year 2025-26 does not persuade it as nothing has been placed on record to show that the DoE has rejected the fixation of fee by the school for the academic session 2024-25 onwards.
Police said despite sustained efforts, the accused remained at large and kept changing locations and…
At a debut solo exhibition in Delhi, an architect-artist explores sand, memory and movement through…
Om Taneja (81) and his wife Indira (77), a doctor, were kept under “digital arrest”…
The court observed although appellant had caused death by rash and negligent act, sending him…
AAP leaders were detained during a protest against the BJP over an alleged doctored video…
NDMC is rolling out a G20-style upgrade of roads, lighting and cleanliness to prepare Delhi…
