Delhi HC
A bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet PS Arora emphasised that failure to produce the draft policy before the next hearing would prompt the court to proceed with the matter
[…]The court highlighted the absence of a mechanism to verify the address provided on ration cards, emphasising that they are intended solely for accessing subsidised food items, not for identification purposes
[…]The court emphasised that the Kalkaji Mandir is for the use of the public, and no individual or entity can exercise exclusive control over any part of it. Therefore, any event must have the administrator’s approval
[…]The court acted on a petition filed by a resident of Gurugram, alleging that Zomato was engaging in “false and fraudulent” practices by delivering fresh food from renowned restaurants under its sub-category, ‘Dilli ke Legends’
[…]Former high court judge Justice Poonam A Bamba, also present at the event, advised lawyers to “detach” when necessary. Dr Achal Bhagat, a senior consultant and psychiatrist at Apollo Hospitals, joined as a speaker.
[…]The bench emphasised that orders related to phone interception, tapping, or tracking are issued by the government when authorized officers deem it necessary for the country’s well-being
[…]In an effort to convey a “meaningful message,” Justice Subramonium Prasad directed that the compensation should be deducted from the salaries of the responsible police officials
[…]Petitions filed by the arrested individuals challenge not only the legality of their arrest but also contest the subsequent 7-day police remand and the FIR filed by the Delhi Police
[…]