delhi high court
The court accused the Delhi government of pursuing power appropriation, following remarks from the government’s counsel that the matter required approvals from Kejriwal, who is currently in custody
[…]The petitioners contested the Ministry of Minority Affairs’ February 7 directive instructing MAEF to commence closure procedures promptly and submit a closure certificate from the Registrar of Societies, Delhi Government
[…]The court took into account documents, such as Aadhaar and domicile, to conclude that it is difficult to retain doubts about the petitioner’s father’s name, adding that when one transliterates a name from vernacular to English, the spellings might differ
[…]The veteran Congress leader and senior cabinet minister had suffered fatal injuries in grenade blasts at Samastipur while inaugurating a broad gauge line on January 2, 1975. He was later transferred for treatment from Samastipur to Danapur where he succumbed to injuries on January 3, 1975
[…]The petitioners, Bajrang Punia, Vinesh Phogat, Sakshi Malik, and her husband Satyawart Kadian, previously protested at Jantar Mantar against former WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh for alleged sexual harassment
[…]The ED’s arrest of Kejriwal came shortly after the high court declined to grant him protection from coercive measures by the central anti-money laundering agency
[…]A bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet PS Arora emphasised that failure to produce the draft policy before the next hearing would prompt the court to proceed with the matter
[…]The court emphasised that the Kalkaji Mandir is for the use of the public, and no individual or entity can exercise exclusive control over any part of it. Therefore, any event must have the administrator’s approval
[…]