delhi high court
The court acted on a petition filed by a resident of Gurugram, alleging that Zomato was engaging in “false and fraudulent” practices by delivering fresh food from renowned restaurants under its sub-category, ‘Dilli ke Legends’
[…]The court ruled that during the man’s lifetime, there was no valid reason for his ex-wife to replace his name with her second husband’s on their son’s school admission form
[…]The bench emphasised that orders related to phone interception, tapping, or tracking are issued by the government when authorized officers deem it necessary for the country’s well-being
[…]In October, the Supreme Court, recognizing the prolonged bondage and inhumane conditions endured by manual scavengers, called for the complete eradication of manual scavenging nationwide
[…]In an effort to convey a “meaningful message,” Justice Subramonium Prasad directed that the compensation should be deducted from the salaries of the responsible police officials
[…]The court noted the cumbersome process, requiring patients to obtain various certificates before submitting applications
[…]The central ridge forest, often referred to as the lungs of the national capital, is an extension of the Aravalli hill range within Delhi
[…]These remarks were made by the court while dismissing an appeal by a woman challenging a family court’s decision to grant a divorce decree in favor of her estranged husband on grounds of cruelty
[…]