delhi high court
The court acknowledged that while such tools might be useful for preliminary understanding or research, they cannot supplant the role of human intelligence or the human touch required in the adjudication process
[…]A bench comprising Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Sanjeev Narula noted that the plea was misdirected towards the State Election Commission, as they were not responsible for the matter in question
[…]The court instructed the Delhi government to formulate a policy concerning such vehicles when their owners pledge not to utilize them within the city and to publicly publicize this policy
[…]The court emphasized that trial courts should meticulously evaluate evidence to prevent the unjust suffering of innocent individuals through wrongful imprisonment
[…]The bench asked the government to submit a status report on the relief efforts and scheduled further hearings for September 13
[…]The court asked the Delhi Police (Headquarter) to assess the manpower required to operate a centralised cell for processing and coordinating the information on proclaimed offenders
[…]The high court’s order came on a petition by Chaalak Shakti, a drivers’ union, which has challenged mandatory uniform for auto rickshaw and taxi drivers and alleged that such labelling was in violation of the Constitution
[…]The court pointed out that the inscription “.315” was present on one cartridge, indicating its caliber, but was absent on the other
[…]